<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/wordpress-mu-1.2.5" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Nathan Haynes on fire in AAA for the Angels</title>
	<link>http://www.angelslocker.com/2007/05/13/nathan-haynes-on-fire-in-aaa-for-the-angels/</link>
	<description>Los Angeles Angels</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 12:31:14 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=wordpress-mu-1.2.5</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: chinmusic</title>
		<link>http://www.angelslocker.com/2007/05/13/nathan-haynes-on-fire-in-aaa-for-the-angels/#comment-118</link>
		<dc:creator>chinmusic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 May 2007 14:44:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.angelslocker.com/2007/05/13/nathan-haynes-on-fire-in-aaa-for-the-angels/#comment-118</guid>
		<description>I think Santana has a much better upside than Saunders does.  But you might get your wish soon as the Devil Rays are very interested in him as a possible part of a package for Carl Crawford.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think Santana has a much better upside than Saunders does.  But you might get your wish soon as the Devil Rays are very interested in him as a possible part of a package for Carl Crawford.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: angelmom</title>
		<link>http://www.angelslocker.com/2007/05/13/nathan-haynes-on-fire-in-aaa-for-the-angels/#comment-116</link>
		<dc:creator>angelmom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 May 2007 02:23:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.angelslocker.com/2007/05/13/nathan-haynes-on-fire-in-aaa-for-the-angels/#comment-116</guid>
		<description>I hope they do call him up, and while they're at it call up Joe Saunders and trade Santana - how can Saunders not be better than him at this point?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hope they do call him up, and while they&#8217;re at it call up Joe Saunders and trade Santana - how can Saunders not be better than him at this point?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
